• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Beyond that, also, what’s so hard about clicking on “File > Export As… > PDF” which is literally in the file menu on LibreOffice at the very least. I don’t know about MS Office, but I would assume it’s the same.

        • Triumph@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          Depends on the application. Print to PDF always produces the output as seen on screen, though without things like fillable fields.

          • autriyo@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Unless you change print options of course, depending on what you’re trying to accomplish it can get really weird.

          • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Output corruption sometimes persists across all different modes of printing/exporting. Some lines in Word starting to go vertical for no reason is one I encountered a lot, the other is Excel insisting on making every cell it’s own list, and it’s usually fixable only by force rebuilding the file container by saving as another doc/docx type, pushing Word to make it from the scratch and drop traces of accumulated file corruption. Funny enough, some of these bugs can’t be reproduced if opened in Libre, that made me prefer it, when applicable, a long time ago.

        • Zwiebel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I was helping someone and both export and print to pdf each messed up different minute aspects of the design/layout. I don’t remember what exactly it was tho sorrx

      • Print to pdf generally loses the text and just makes it an image though. Which can balloon size and prevent ctrl+f without running ocr on it and saving an additional layer with more mistakes than the original.

        • BanMe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Are you sure you don’t have “print as image” enabled there? It should keep it as a layered PDF, not rasterizing.

            • dingus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I deliberately use the print as image feature if I don’t want someone to be able to select text or search the document (like if I’m sending something with sensitive info as an attachment to an email). Most of the time, I have that option disabled so the document can be searchable and text can be copied from it.

              • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Gmail reads the images with OCR and adds it to search terms. Your steps are a noble effort to increase reverse engineering effort, however there are image to text desktop apps now so that effort on the receivers side is almost nothing these days.

              • RaccoonBall@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                16 hours ago

                fwiw its trivial to OCR it. single click in many pdf software.

                but I guess it slows down some people

                • dingus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Right…the idea isn’t to make it foolproof, it’s just to make a barrier. People generally go for easier targets over ones with a small barrier. If you have two bikes next to each other in public, one with a bike lock and one with no lock at all, the casual thief is way more likely to steal the one without a lock. Bike locks can easily be broken, but they serve as a deterrent.

    • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m going to assume you’re on the younger side. That’s a relatively recent thing. For many many years we had to install PDF printers.

      Also the PDF printer is generic, but the export has to implemented for each application individually.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’m in my forties. The post we are talking about was made in February 2026. Priyanka Lakhara definitely looks younger than me, didn’t even make her Twitter account until January 2024.

        What does age or how it worked in the past have to do with a post made… four days ago by someone who is either late twenties to mid-thirties at most?

        Also, in those old timey wimey years I was just pirating Adobe Acrobat.

        • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The age comment is not about the age of the posts, but about how you seem so surprised about printing as PDF rather than export as PDF.

          Using a virtual printer was the norm until relatively recently, and even then it’s still the most effective because anything than can print can use that to generate a PDF.

          That’s how I still create PDFs honestly.

          Didn’t want you offend, sorry if came out wrong