• BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Are fine, but not 100% compatible with all Office files and very heavyweight for viewing a document.

      The problem is that Office file formats are an “open” standard but not a real open standard. PDF is.

      Edit: Hell, not even all Office files are openable in all modern versions of Office. I have an Excel file I have to use once a quarter that will only open in locally installed versions of Office, not Office365. I keep a VM with Windows on it just for this one file.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        PDF is still shit, despite being open. Even a “minimal” viewer like mupdf has to carry a 100MB library with it. Interpreting them is arcane knowledge.

        • BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh I agree, I’m not saying that PDF is some sort of document format perfection. But it is a fully open one with a spec that fits in 250 pages, as opposed to docx’s 7500(!!) page spec with undocumented binary blobs mixed in.

          • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Meanwhile, Commonmark… whoa, still 126 pages printed as pdf, with all edge cases. Though they do want to be well-specified.