• BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Are fine, but not 100% compatible with all Office files and very heavyweight for viewing a document.

    The problem is that Office file formats are an “open” standard but not a real open standard. PDF is.

    Edit: Hell, not even all Office files are openable in all modern versions of Office. I have an Excel file I have to use once a quarter that will only open in locally installed versions of Office, not Office365. I keep a VM with Windows on it just for this one file.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      PDF is still shit, despite being open. Even a “minimal” viewer like mupdf has to carry a 100MB library with it. Interpreting them is arcane knowledge.

      • BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Oh I agree, I’m not saying that PDF is some sort of document format perfection. But it is a fully open one with a spec that fits in 250 pages, as opposed to docx’s 7500(!!) page spec with undocumented binary blobs mixed in.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Meanwhile, Commonmark… whoa, still 126 pages printed as pdf, with all edge cases. Though they do want to be well-specified.