• Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Definitely don’t bring your own homebrew stingray device to scrape data from the personal phones of gravy-seals.

      No, seriously, it’s probably a huge FCC violation.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      We know that trump was lying about Renee Good and Alex Pretti because people had their phones with them.

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Use your phone if you HAPPEN to see something to record while incidentally out and about. If you’re SPECIFICALLY putting yourself out there to protest, document, or obstruct action, it’s insane to bring your actual phone - get a dumb digital camera. It comes with MUCH less liability, and from a purely practical point of view you don’t wind up trying to explain to your phone company why your phone being stomped into bits by a Nazi should be covered by the insurance. Not to mention you can pop the SD card and hide it if you need to. It’s just smarter.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    COPY/PASTA

    In the US we have the Second Amendment. The fascists have been the ones screaming and yelling about the Second Amendment, but the truth is that all Americans have the right.

    Owning a gun isn’t enough. Driving to Cabela’s and picking up a vermin killing .22 rifle is not enough. You should buy a proper rifle, a pistol, and a knife or baton. (Bonus points for a shotgun) Then you need to train with said rifle, pistol and knife/baton. Go to a range and shoot. Look for local self defense/hand to hand combat with a weapon classes and train.

    I am not advocating for violence…far from it. But I am advocating for knowledge because owning a weapon and not knowing how to use it is a recipe for disaster.

    PS: If you can afford it, buy suppressors and/or active hearing protection. Especially for your rifles. Suppression for the common citizen isn’t about stealth like in the movies, it is about protecting your hearing. Guns are LOUD. Much louder than you expect. Suppressors might be out of reach for most but quality active hearing protection is not.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Whenever this comes up I like to add:

      • Don’t get a gun in some obscure caliber. Get a pistol in 9mm or a riffle in 223 (even better get a 5.56x45 NATO) or 308 win, that way ammo will be cheaper and you can better afford training with it. Shooting a few hundred rounds is not really enough. You’ll need to train regularly.
      • Learn how to maintain your gun. As in how to clean it, what parts need lubrication, adjusting the sights, etc.
      • Speaking as an electronic engineer, get passive ear protection. Active noise cancelling is cool and all, but what about when the batteries run out and you have no protection? Or what the electronics fail? Protect your ears, but when you can get +100 rounds of ammo for the price difference, then I would prioritize the ammo budget.
      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wonder if active noise canceling doesn’t have a delay that pretty much nullifies said protection in the case of quick loud bangs.

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 hours ago

          For consumer bluetooth earbuds with a high level of latency (think what you’d use on your phone), certainly - which is why you should never try to use everyday use headphones as genuine hearing protection for things such as industrial environments or gunshots.

          Dedicated hearing protection devices perform all their audio functions locally with almost no latency at all (unless you count using an aux jack in conjunction for something like two-way radios, which don’t interfere with the noise cancelling).

          TL;DR - yes for devices not designed to protect your ears, no for devices designed as hearing protection (because of their specific design and operation).

          • [object Object]@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            From what I understand, typically audio compression has about 20 ms of ramp-up, though it can be theoretically lowered about ten times — not sure how well it would work in that case, though. Consider that aural reaction speed is apparently way better than visual, wherein the latter is on the order of 200 ms. As is confirmed by musicians hearing a lag of around 15 ms. This leads me to believe that human hearing would probably pick up the shots sound before noise cancellation kicks in, otherwise the cancellation is too sensitive for anything else to be heard.

            Of course, this skips the most important aspect of, how much sound pressure would be dangerous to one’s ears with different kinds of protection — with which I’m not versed at all.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be fair protests would be 3000% more effective if everyone had guns.

    Not shooting anybody. Just protest while having guns on the side.

    Everyone at once specifically tho.

    • in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Nah, AK mags are double stack so you just push the rounds down. Not like pistol mags where you have to push em in from the front of the feedlips. Not much chance of breaking a nail.