<a href=“https://imgbox.com/qlaBvJVW” target=“_blank”><img src=“https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/ab/b9/qlaBvJVW_t.png” alt=“image host”/></a>
The moderators of lemmy.ml show an unwillingness to accept rational discussion and demonstrate a flawed understanding of mutual respect.
Discussion continues here
Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.
Do you agree? If not, what is your counterargument?
Edit:
Among the meaningless comments made by people who are incapable of rational thinking, these few are actually meaningful and reasonable.
From @Ildsaye@hexbear.net
Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.
However those comments can only prove Surveillance are unacceptable in America and Zionist related countries, Can anyone provide a counterpoint for other countries like Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea…


It is not
yes
Now that the moderators of lemmy.ml show an unwillingness to accept rational discussion and demonstrate a flawed understanding of mutual respect, I see why it is predictable
This bothering you?
This is not Idiocracy, the point of this post is to justify or invalidate the idea of “Surveillance on public is acceptable” in countries like Russia, China, India…