<a href=“https://imgbox.com/qlaBvJVW” target=“_blank”><img src=“https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/ab/b9/qlaBvJVW_t.png” alt=“image host”/></a>
The moderators of lemmy.ml show an unwillingness to accept rational discussion and demonstrate a flawed understanding of mutual respect.
Discussion continues here
Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.
Do you agree? If not, what is your counterargument?
Edit:
Among the meaningless comments made by people who are incapable of rational thinking, these few are actually meaningful and reasonable.
From @Ildsaye@hexbear.net
Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.
However those comments can only prove Surveillance are unacceptable in America and Zionist related countries, Can anyone provide a counterpoint for other countries like Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea…
I agree, however the point of this post is to justify or invalidate the idea of “Surveillance on public is acceptable” in countries like Russia, China, India…