It’s always a concern when travelling to another country. There’s the decision between biometrics, passcode and/or burner. When travelling, always keep in mind that legality varies, and a country’s compliance with their laws varies as well…

Prepare ahead of time, always.

deleted by creator

They’re just easy to ignore, although I suppose cigarette warnings are large and graphic but that doesn’t stop most either…

I suppose those who care would read it in any form. Maybe this followed by some sort of promotional videos to alert the general public? I would take this type of info-graphic in any form though.

deleted by creator

Nvidia will prioritize AI and more than likely know when to bail before the bubble bursts. They will have made boatloads for shareholders while leaving so many others in financial ruin. Whether those caught in the bubble burst should have known better… I guess it’s a case by case basis.

Beautiful! I agree. But not like our current warning labels, which are mostly relegated to a small black and white box in the corner.

Part of what ruins games for me are the massive publishers behind them. EA, Ubisoft, Rockstar.

The games may be great. The developers may be great. The studios (by and large) interfere in the process of development, the monetization, the end-of-life plan…

For me, when I have the chance to play games, I’ve found myself opting for smaller studios or indie games.

Also I want to shout out Ross Scott of Accursed Farms. He covers so many cool and obscure games. He has worked incredibly hard towards enacting pro-consumer business practices in the gaming world. He’s a very smart and pragmatic guy. I would highly recommend anyone who’s into gaming to check out his site and content.

To me, he’s been an inspiration in his uphill battle of the Stop Killing Games initiative. He’s been working through the apathy, the negativity, the doubt. It’s actually incredible what he’s achieved. A man with passion and a plan, who happens to also make some damn good game related videos.

Ok I realize this just turned into a love letter for Ross Scott. I’m okay with that.

Voting by platform and re-evaluating based on results is much better than voting by party. Hell, like so may others I was ready to vote for a conservative leader after the Trudeau era. But Carney struck me as a competent and well spoken progressive conservative in Liberal clothing. So I voted Liberal again!

PP surviving this may be good for the current government in the sense that people want to stay the hell away from him (I totally get that). But post-Davos PP actually gave a level-headed response to Carney’s speech - saying that it was a good speech but needs actions to follow. I don’t disagree with PP on that, I mean, anybody who voted for Carney will also agree, because it’s kind of a no-duh statement.

So, PP remains. Ok. I hope that he can see the way the winds are shifting and drop the Maple Maga talking points and work with the current government meaningfully.

You know, it’s all so new, the world is moving so fast, we can only wait and see how the dynamics play out. Carney has shown willingness to draw in provincial premiers together and even change some minds (like Ontario’s Ford with automotive). Maybe, just maybe, Carney can get PP to consider constructive dialogue, and that if there is an issue the current Conservative Party is passionate about, we can work with them to understand their position and try to find a solution that works across the board - and very importantly - in a way that represents the general majority’s interests.

I’d like to see leaders making their positions known, pushing for them when they’re substantive, but also making concessions if they make sense. We’re at a point where we need to take as much unity across the aisle as we can get.

And everyone, don’t forget to look into your provincial elections and your provincial policies too! Our system places a lot of power in provincial leaders, they are equally important as federal elections for domestic issues!