I’m not entirely convinced that you know what words mean, but…

This is part of the comment I replied to:

We shall ignore your weak and insincere apology [edit: <— see? Do you see it?]

To which I said that he’s not capable of making an apology so holding him to that standard is weird. Really, it’s weird and ableist. People should stop doing it.

Why are you misrepresenting what I wrote?

Just as a practical matter, demanding any kind of apology or explanation from a guy who physically cannot communicate seems like a big ask. In this case ‘quality of apology’ is a foolish metric. It would be nice if Chomsky could explain himself, but he can’t.

Chomsky is 97 years old and had a massive stroke several years ago. He’s not capable of speaking or writing.