• cheesybuddha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Zardoz was awesome though. It actually had an interesting world and compelling sci fi ideas. And one of the greatest reveals in cinema! You know why call him “Zardoz”, right?

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t think he’ he’d be a good Gandalf anyways

    nothing against him, but what we got was perfect.

  • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    To be fair to Connery, Zardoz was right after 007. He was type casted and nobody would hire him. He had to do something different to get new work. Also, Zardoz is legit a good movie… If you get past the weird and laughable aesthetic choices, the plot is a decent sci fi plot.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I heard this story, not sure if it’s true, but I choose to believe it and will not hear any corrections; apparently, he was approached about Gandalf, but he turned it down because he didn’t really understand it. Then he was approached about Dumbledore, but turned it down because he didn’t really understand it. After seeing how those two franchises turned out, he said, “screw it, I’m taking the next role that I don’t get.” That role was Alan Quartermaine in League of Extraordinary Gentleman. After that movie bombed he retired from acting altogether.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That role was Alan Quartermaine in League of Extraordinary Gentleman. After that movie bombed he retired from acting altogether.

      Which is a shame really because I remember it being… Kinda good? Clearly not a work of great art, but fun action silliness. Admittedly I watched it as a kid and never again so who knows really.

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t feel the need to discuss the rest of the movie but that car, though … It was a thing of beauty.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d also argue that however the movie did after the fact, turning down roles you don’t understand is probably the smarter option. Maybe those other movies would have also flopped if they had Connery in those roles.

      Like I can’t picture him doing a good Gandalf. It wouldn’t be Gandalf, it would be Sean Connery in a wizard outfit. I can’t think of any roles where Connery played someone who wasn’t Sean Connery. He brought a lot of charisma to his roles but not a ton of range.

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Jesus can you actually imagine if LOTR had Sean Connery instead of Ian McKellen? Hideous prospect. No shade to Connery, he’s played some of my favourite characters over the years, but christ that would have been a terrible mistake.