It would be “impossible” to move 40% of Taiwan’s semiconductor capacity to the U.S., the island’s top tariff negotiator said, pushing back against recent comments by American officials who called for a major production shift.

In an interview with Taiwanese television channel CTS that was broadcast late on Sunday, Taiwan Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun said she had made it clear to Washington that Taiwan’s semiconductor ecosystem, built up over decades, could not be relocated.

“I have made it very clear to the United States that this is impossible,” she said, referring to the 40% goal the U.S. has floated.

That ecosystem will continue to grow in Taiwan, Cheng said, adding that the semiconductor industry would keep investing at home.

  • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The real impossibility is the work force, as far as my knowledge is knowledged from a while back.

    Also if they did move 40% of production to the US, I can’t personally see that meaning the US would drop taiwan and let china take it. If you think about that for 1 second longer, you think they’d surrender 60% to china? If I had the best chips, I wouldn’t let anyone else get anywhere near them, lest they steal the secret recipe. (Just my thoughts on the matter).

    (p.s. im not smart so maybe im wrong?)

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I just wanna say. The main issue has always been - American capitalists went to China for manufacturing and shipped all the know how and technologies there.
    Because they wanted profits over the country.
    This is the result.

    Blame capitalist owners

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    With 40% semiconductor capacity loved to the US, the US will have no more reason to defend Taiwan, it would be suicide

    Also, when trump gets his grubby hands on ASML systems you can count on it that he’ll sell it to the Chinese for a few millions right after

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Have you considered that if the Taiwanese people wanted to live under PRC rule, they would’ve voted for it long ago?

      • festus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Why is it indefensible? It’s literally an island which limits attacks to air and sea.

        • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Us can’t even handle Iran arsenal. Us and Israel had to stop aggression after 12 days after running out of all the anti air equipment. Did u know US burned through quarter of all thaads in existence while defending zionists?
          And we pay for this shit.
          Us weapons are not made for conflicts of high intensity, very expensive.

        • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          With what components everything is made in China you’re planning on defending taiwan from China with components made in China? they will immediately ban all the export that are shipped to us if any kind of hostile activities happen.

  • hector@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    If they moved enough to the US we could stop supporting them in case of China taking them. That is the subtext here and it’s not lost on Taiwan. No amount of tarriffs would convince them to give up their flagship industry to their biggest customer and lose their importance.

    It’s also an empty tarriff threat. Taiwan has more semiconductors than there are people to buy them. We need the chips, they don’t need to sell them here specificially. I really don’t think the US has any leverage beyond supporting them against China, and the supply chain, which the netherlands and other countries have as much leverage as we do with.

  • Patrikvo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wasn’t logistics the US’s superpower? I’d expect someone to explain their chief that factories aren’t monolitic objects that can be picked up and delivered to a new location and go right into production?

    • user28282912@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The logistics accolade that you mention here is wartime logistics. That is ability to get the bullets and bandages to the places and people that need them all in a timely manner. The US is good at this because we have bases and transport logistics everywhere.

      Military supply chain logistics(multiple sources for stuff, supposedly US companies…) is absolutely a consideration as well but this concept has been hallowed out over time. What used to be locally sourced materials and manufacturing by American companies is now much more dependent on overseas labor/materials. These ‘American’ companies might have corporate offices here and the c-levels, marketing/sales teams live here but all of the actual product is sourced/made in Mexico, Canada, China, India, Vietnam, etc. There are definitely specific industries like aerospace that still make a lot of stuff here but that is a small fraction of the larger whole.

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      He still can’t grasp what a tariff even is, after a decade of repeated explanations. Trying to explain to him global supply chain logistics is not a realistic goal.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah what really struck me about the whole thing is it’s not that he wants more investment in US manufacturing, it’s that he seems to want them to literally take their equipment (but presumably not the people because eww immigrants) and transport the whole lot to the US.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            And potentially also SK, Japan, the Philippines, Singapore, etc.

            It really would be like the dumbest possible thing the US could do.

            • Triasha@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              He backed off Greenland. Taiwan would be an order of magnitude worse. The US could occupy any country on earth (maybe not China, without some Roman level war crimes) But it would be the end of us.

              • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                The US could occupy any country on earth (maybe not China, without some Roman level war crimes)

                Hahaha, no.

                The US could invade maybe two countries with a GDP around 1/4 ours, and actually persistently occupy them for maybe a few years.

                Our economy is crashing extremely rapidly, we’ve functionally lost the ability to build new warships or aircraft in anything approaching a timely or affordable manner… and, because we have decided to tariff and threaten or militarily attack basically everyone everyone…

                All of our supply chains for a great deal of our fancy schmancy military tech doesn’t work any more.

                You cant build complex guided missiles and computer chips and sensors that aim them or night vision goggles without access to a wide array or rare earth minerals, most of which China basically has a near total monopoly of.

                We don’t have the native industrial base to build anywhere near everything we would need to, to actually autarkicly sustain our own war machine.

                … we can’t even feed or house our population at a reasonable cost anymore, our internal infrastructure is physically falling apart, and our cybersecurity is beyond laughably comprimised.

                There is no way this country would ‘win’ trying to occupy Taiwan.

                China + Japan + SK + all of goddamned SEA + potentially even Australia vs US = we fucking lose hard.

                We may be able to get away with some neo-Monroe Doctrine bullshit for a while.

                And keep funding genocides in the ME, and doing random airstrikes and spec ops shennanigans in poorer countries.

                Thats about it.

                • Triasha@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  I meant we could occupy them like we occupied Iraq. We would win the military confrontation. The occupation would break us.

                  We could do it once, maybe twice or three times if the countries are small and weak, but it would break us. The rest of the world would adjust. We would all be poorer but the US would be fucked. Trump doesn’t understand that we built a military too expensive to actually use. It made sense if we wanted to avoid conflict, and casualties, while still being top dog and getting our way, but actually going in and occupying territory is medieval thinking.

    • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be fair, this all started under the Biden administration with the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022.

      The US is increasingly concerned that, if China invades Taiwan, it will completely lock them out from semiconductor manufacturing and crater the US economy. Rather than flex their soft power and exercise a little diplomacy like the US used to do in decades past, they’ve apparently decided that the invasion of Taiwan is inevitable and the only course of action is to bolster semiconductor manufacturing at home.

      Trump, of course, has all the subtlety of a torpedo and his rhetoric here has been needlessly antagonistic… but yeah, this whole thing started under Biden and now Trump is pretending it was always his idea. So really the thing he stole was the policy.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        While the CHIPS act was started under Biden, it was completely different from what is being done now. It was about developing a domestic source of semiconductors as a hedge against Taiwan being invaded and was done cooperatively with the Taiwanese with mutual benefits. The Taiwanese still owned the manufacturing here, so they would still benefit if the Chinese came invaded. Biden was doing what was smart to do and also had benefits for other countries, including EU allies, since everyone knows those plants in Taiwan are rigged to blow at the first hint of invasion…

        Trump has removed the benefits and added tariffs and threats. He didn’t steal the policy. He inherited it and then changed it to be something evil.

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          The plants are rigged to blow in an invasion? That is smart. Iraq did that in the first persian gulf war, he blew the oil fields the Americans were seizing. We all expected him to do that in the Iraq war, but for whatever reasons they never did. He might as well have.

          But that would be such a massive loss of investment, and probably a real disincentive to invasion, those factories are not something that can be replaced in one year. Especially with all the specialized machines, where there are only one manufacturer of.

          • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I clearly don’t know it for a fact that TSMC has done that, but the idea is a widely talked about strategy for protection. U.S. politicians even talk openly to the press about us blowing up the fabs if Taiwan doesn’t.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    And it would be a tactical blunder to give the US any access to their current generation of chips. Even more so while Trump is in office. Taiwan should look into ending relationships with the US and getting closer to the EU, South/Central America, and Africa.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      They don’t have to move anything, just share the patents and export the specialized equipment to build new factories. There’s no need to move existing manufacturing capabilities.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why give up your advantage? Taiwan doesn’t need to sell the chips to the US, the US needs their chips. There is no reason to hand over the technology, know how, or anything.

  • user28282912@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Everyone seems to have thought that is was a great idea to let pretty much every core manufacturing competency die in the US over the last 30 years or so. How’s that working out for us now?

    The blame is at least as old as Reagan, really accelerated with Clinton (NAFTA, China entering the WTO) and only got worse from there.

    As much as I hate to admit it, tariffs are the answer. I also think that it’s important to understand that Trump’s tariffs exist only for extortion and bribes that benefit him personally. Tariffs can be used to encourage domestic production of goods and services that are clearly not something that we want to depend on other countries for merely for the sake of enriching the same circle of already rich assholes in perpetuity. Rich assholes would just have to keep resorting to pumping up immigration to suppress wages for these domestic goods, like they have always done for hundreds of years at this point.

    • Quirky Quinn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Tariffs are not going to encourage local producers. They’re just going to make the products more expensive for the consumers. If you want to encourage the industries to be built here, then subsudize their development.

  • luierik@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why even say ‘we cannot move production to the USA’?

    Why not just say ‘Are you actual crazy? Fuck right off, don’t bother me’