• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, but at the same time, they do care about these 2, so we should use their names. Putting individual faces to the victims is powerful, but if we put 100 faces out there’s they all get lost in the crowd and it stops feeling personal.

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 days ago

      For a long time the powers that be have played us against eachother with “them and us” tactics. When its ‘them’ dying its not a problem, they might have had it coming, its a ‘them’ thing. When they do it to ‘us’, recent converts realise one of two things ; [we were all us all along and they played me for a fool] or [they’re coming after us too].

      Either way, they’re now an ally. You can preach at them when this is over, and sort the 1st and 2nd kind apart at a more convenient time. Don’t try and shame them for not coming onside sooner, it’ll only create problems.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Curse of the left, exploited by the oligarchy, infighting. Half of members join left groups to kick the other half out.

    • vatlark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      I do think it’s important that we check ourselves. Having a lot footage I think also plays a big role, George Floyd being another example.

      I don’t know of footage of the other ICE deaths, but maybe that’s a bias at play.

      • hobovision@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s also the “one death is a tragedy, 100 deaths is a statistic” situation happening.

        Another factor is that these murders are breaking through to the folks that see the violence of arrests and raids and the deaths and injury of detainees more as a necessary cost. They can’t justify these murders in their world view and they can empathize with them because they know these people did “nothing wrong” and were still killed. Maybe it could be them next?

        • definitemaybe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The big difference with the two recent ICE murders is that the video evidence:

          • Is graphic
          • Clearly shows no wrongdoing on the part of the victims
          • Shows sudden and completely unnecessary escalation to murder

          And they were both US citizens, so ICE has no jurisdiction. So it doesn’t even matter if they were serial murderers—that’s a police matter, not immigration. (And, obviously, being white and valued members of their communities matters, too.)

          Contrast that with:

          • The Canadian who died in custody because they were denied access to necessary life-saving medications has plausible deniability.
          • Many deaths by suicide in custody are “their fault” because they did it.
          • ICE shootings without video evidence could plausibly be self-defense.
          • Etc.

          Plus, they’re (mostly) not American citizens, so ICE could have a legal reason to detain them “with force” for “resisting arrest” (or whatever they want to spin).

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have seen a lot of online chatter that starts with ‘but he was a white guy’. Tells you a lot about the average american’s view of the world.